02 May

It’s title or bust for Ohio State, but Oregon can win league in Year 1

May is one of the craziest months of the year when it comes climbing inside the mind of a college football fan. While no offseason month can compete with a fan’s passion during the season, May comes close. It’s the start of the dog days of the offseason but also the closest to the end of spring practices.

Spring practice can do remarkable things to one’s brain chemistry. Last year’s team is gone, and the only glimpse you’ve had of what’s to come next came from news reports from two weeks of practices and, if you’re lucky, what you saw on television during the spring game — if it even was a spring game, which, more and more often these days, it’s not.

Fans take this limited information available to them and draw grand conclusions. Yes, it’s a silly process, but it’s wholly understandable all the same. We all crave the new season and do what we must to get by. So, as I’ve done every spring around here, I am about to put myself into the mind of every college football fanbase around the Big Ten and overreact to what I saw this spring. Most of these thoughts will be thrown out the window by the second quarter of the first game, but some may prove to be true.

Illinois
The Illini have the best offensive line in the conference: It should be no surprise that a Bret Bielema team looks strong on the offensive line. There are a lot of question marks about Illinois on the defensive side of the ball as we head to the summer, but based on what the Illini showed this spring, there’s plenty of reason to be optimistic about the depth with the hog mollies up front. Illinois added New Mexico transfer J.C. Davis from the transfer portal, and early returns on his performance have the Illini thinking they could have an All-Big Ten left tackle.

Indiana
There aren’t enough balls to go around for all the skill players: Coach Curt Cignetti takes over an Indiana program that’s won nine games over the last three seasons. And the last quarterback to lead the team to a winning record (Michael Penix Jr.) was a top-10 pick in the 2024 NFL Draft after leading a different program (Washington) to the College Football Playoff National Championship. It’s a tough scene! However, it will improve quickly based on what we saw this spring.

Indiana’s biggest transfer portal win this offseason was convincing receiver Donaven McCulley to stay, and he’s the leader of what could be Indiana’s deepest receiving corps in years. Toss in four transfer running backs (Justice Ellison, Ty Son Lawton, Kaelon Black, Elijah Green), and it looks like the Hoosiers will have no shortage of options on offense alongside transfer QB Kurtis Rourke.

Iowa
The Hawkeyes finally have a modern college football offense: Coaching staffs make a point not to put too much on tape for opponents to see in spring games, but there was a sense that new Iowa offensive coordinator Tim Lester wanted to make sure Iowa fans knew this wasn’t going to be the same offense. Yes, those were three receiver sets you saw, with Iowa running out of 11 personnel (3 WR, 1 RB), and that was a lot more motion than Iowa fans are used to seeing. It’s beginning to look a lot like 2014 in Iowa City! Seriously, though, the changes Iowa showed in the playbook are encouraging, but there are still some key personnel questions. QB Cade McNamara was not a full participant this spring following his ACL injury, and Deacon Hill is in the transfer portal.

Maryland
The Terrapins still can’t run the ball: Maryland ran the ball less often than anybody else in the Big Ten last season, perhaps for good reason. It wasn’t very effective when it did. The Terps averaged only 3.7 yards per carry, and their rushing success rate was 40.2%, which ranked ninth in the league. Based on what was displayed this spring, it’s hard to know how much improvement we’ll see. Roman Hemby broke off a 44-yard touchdown run in the spring game, but other than that, the Terps struggled to run the ball between the tackles. Hitting home runs is great, but it’s easier to consistently move the ball on offense in the Big Ten with a good run game, particularly when replacing your starting quarterback.

Michigan
This is the greatest defense of all tine (next to the 1985 Chicago Bears): No school saw more players taken in the NFL Draft this season than Michigan, which saw 13 of the players who helped it win a national title selected by NFL teams. That’s an awful lot of talent to replace, but the craziest part is that the Wolverines might have three future first-round picks remaining on their defense right now. Mason Graham and Kenneth Grant anchor what should be one of the best defensive lines in the country, while cornerback Will Johnson could be the first corner selected next spring.

There are a lot of questions about Michigan heading into the fall, but most of them are on the offensive side of the ball. While it’s more than fair to speculate that the Wolverines will struggle to defend their title, the defense alone will help keep them near the top of the Big Ten standings.

Michigan State
Aidan Chiles is “The Chosen One”: There’s always spring excitement around a program that made a coaching change, and while Spartans fans were pumped to see their new-look team, the one player everybody wanted to see was Chiles. The transfer quarterback followed Jonathan Smith to East Lansing from Oregon State, and while his overall spring game numbers weren’t incredible (7/ of 14 for 106 yards and a TD), he showed flashes of what he can do. He showed off his arm and legs at different times and led the offense on multiple touchdown drives.

All of which is huge. While there have been no shortage of problem areas in the program the last few years, the biggest problem has been the lack of a difference-maker at quarterback. Payton Thorne had a couple of nice seasons statistically but wasn’t a game-changer. You can argue the Spartans haven’t had a true difference-maker at the position since Connor Cook in 2015 or even Kirk Cousins in 2011. Chiles has the talent and potential to be that kind of player.

Stanford v Oregon State
Aidan Chiles could be the next big thing at Michigan State after transferring from Oregon State. Getty Images
Minnesota
Max Brosmer is the field general this team needs: There were plenty of reasons why Minnesota needed to upgrade the quarterback room this offseason, and it wasn’t just on-field performance. However, finishing near the bottom of the league in most passing categories certainly didn’t help. The Gophers brought in Max Brosmer from New Hampshire, where he may not have played against Big Ten defenses, but he picked up plenty of experience. Brosmer played in 36 games at New Hampshire and was an AP Second Team FCS All-American and Walter Payton Award Finalist, which is that FCS’ version of the Heisman Trophy.

Brosmer is still catching up with his new playbook and teammates, but Minnesota coach P.J. Fleck raved all spring about the leadership and intangibles he’s already shown through it all.

Nebraska
There are too many elite quarterbacks: The QB position was a disaster for the Cornhuskers last year. Between Jeff Sims and Heinrich Haarberg, Nebraska struggled to move the ball through the air and turned the ball over far too often. The big story this offseason was the arrival of five-star phenom Dylan Raiola, but while Raiola has been crowned the team’s QB of the future and carries the weight of an entire fanbase on his shoulders, he may still have competition from Haarberg. Both played well in Nebraska’s spring game. Raiola completed 16 of his 22 passes for 238 yards and two touchdowns, while Haarberg was 8 of 13 for 163 yards and two scores of his own.

Northwestern
The Wildcats don’t have a quarterback: Brandon Sullivan’s exit to the transfer portal was one of the biggest eyebrow-raising moments of the spring in the Big Ten. Sullivan appeared in 12 games over the last two seasons and was viewed as the favorite to take over the starting job from Ben Bryant. His departure leaves Ryan Hilinski, Jack Lausch and Aidan Gray as the lone QBs on the roster, and it’s unclear which one will be the starter this fall.

Ohio State
It’s national title or bust: This was felt before spring practice began, but the spring has only reinforced the belief in Columbus. Everything Ohio State has done this offseason has given the impression that this program is tired of playing second-fiddle to its hated rival and is ready to win its first national title in 10 years. While the quarterback battle continues to rage on, the expectation remains that Kansas State transfer Will Howard will be the favorite for the gig, but honestly, it might not matter much. Ohio State continues to have an impressive collection of skill talent to take the load off the QB, and the defense is stacked from front to back. Everybody has looked the part this spring.

Oregon
The Ducks can win the Big Ten in their first season: In the modern era of conference realignment, most programs have struggled to adapt to their new environments. Oregon has no plans to continue the trend. The Ducks are considered a possible favorite in the Big Ten already, for good reason. Bo Nix is off to the NFL, but he’s been replaced by Dillon Gabriel, who has won plenty of games in his college career. Despite the losses, the Ducks roster remains strong along the lines of scrimmage, has talent at the skill positions, and a young, talented defense ready to come into its own.

usatsi-22204899-168396417-lowres-1.jpg
Can Dan Lanning’s Oregon Ducks win the Big Ten in Year 1? USATSI
Penn State
This is the offense that will work: Andy Kotelnicki joined Penn State as offensive coordinator this winter, coming from Kansas, where he had tremendous success. Kotelnicki is the sixth offensive coordinator at Penn State in James Franklin’s 11 seasons. There were high hopes about the Nittany Lions offense last season with Drew Allar taking over at quarterback, and while there were moments, the offense largely failed to live up to the hype.

Penn State’s biggest problem last year was a lack of explosive plays. Its explosive play rate of 10.5% finished seventh in the Big Ten and No. 103 nationally. (That seemed to be a problem for the entire league!) Kansas’ offense under Kotelnicki ranked seventh. With the lack of an obvious big-play threat at receiver and Penn State having to replace a couple of significant pieces on the offensive line, the pressure will be on Kotelnicki to scheme up explosive plays. It’s something he did quite well at Kansas.

Purdue
The pass rush will be the envy of the conference: Not a lot went according to plan in Ryan Walters’ first season at Purdue in 2023, but one thing the Boilermakers knew how to do was get after the QB. Purdue finished third in the league in pressure rate (37.9%) behind Penn State and Michigan, and trailed only Penn State in sack rate (8.6%). There is concern that the production could dip with Nic Scourton (10 sacks, 15.5 TFL) transferring to Texas A&M and Kydran Jenkins (7.5 sacks, 15.5 TFL) moving to inside linebacker. That wasn’t the case in the spring, as players like Yanni Karlaftis (younger brother of George Karlaftis), Jireh Ojata and Mo Omonode all showed an ability to get after it.

Rutgers
Naseim Brantley will be worth the wait: The quarterback battle continues to be an area of focus, and it’s a battle that likely won’t be settled until the fall. In the meantime, it’s nice to know the winner will have a top receiving option. Brantley transferred to Rutgers from Western Illinois last year but was ineligible and didn’t play in 2023. He was on the field this spring and immediately noticeable. Brantley finished the spring game with four catches for 73 yards and produced with Athan Kaliakmanis and A.J. Surace at QB. Early indications are Brantley will be a focal point of the Rutgers passing attack.

UCLA
Last year’s pass rush hasn’t made the move to the Big Ten yet: There has been plenty of change for the Bruins this offseason, both on and off the field. One spot that’s taken a huge hit is the pass rush. Defensive coordinator D’Anton Lynn has left for the same job at USC, while stud pass rushers Laiatu Latu, Gabriel Murphy, Grayson Murphy and Carl Jones (a combined 28 sacks and 52 TFL) are gone, and there are no clear replacements. The good news is the Bruins were able to hold onto Jay Toia after he initially entered the transfer portal, but as things stand, there are far more questions than answers in this front seven.

USC
Lincoln Riley is a defensive mastermind now: Caleb Williams is gone. He was the No. 1 pick in the draft, and how the Trojans replace him will be a big part of their 2024 season. But when Riley is your coach, you can assume a certain level of competence on offense. Whether it’s Miller Moss or UNLV transfer Jayden Maiava leading the way, the Trojans will put points on the board.

The big story this offseason (aside from USC being included in a Big Ten story) is the philosophical change on the defensive side of the ball. Alex Grinch is out, and D’Anton Lynn and a host of experienced and accomplished coaches are in. The results are already showing. While USC must continue to upgrade its talent level and depth on the defensive side of the ball, the unit already looks more cohesive this spring.

Washington
We’ll need a few more months to learn everybody’s names: I haven’t been keeping count, but there may not be a program with more new faces than Washington. The team that reached the College Football Playoff National Championship has nearly been uprooted in its entirety. Between a change in coaching staffs, transfers, and 10 players being selected in the NFL Draft, this team is practically unrecognizable.

That’s not to say players didn’t stand out in coach Jedd Fisch’s first spring in Seattle. The offensive line may have questions, but Zach Durfee looks like he could be a problem on defense, and receiver Denzel Boston is ready to take some of those targets Rome Odunze, Jalen McMillan and Ja’Lynn Polk left behind. Still, with all the new faces and new opponents on the schedule, Washington fans have a lot of studying to do between now and the season-opener against Weber State.

Jedd Fisch’s Washington Huskies will have a brand new look in 2024. Getty Images
Wisconsin
The Dairy Raid is pasteurized, homogenized, and weaponized: There was plenty of hoopla about the new-look Wisconsin offense last year, but for the most part, the results in 2023 were underwhelming. Part of it was due to Wisconsin dealing with QB injuries, but part of it was also because the roster hadn’t been churned enough to where the talent on hand met the requirements of what was asked by a new system. Heading into Year 2, the Badgers look ready to take a step forward.

Miami transfer Tyler Van Dyke is settling into the new locker room, while Oklahoma transfer Tawee Walker looks ready to combine with Chez Mellusi as an effective duo of running backs.

02 May

LSU, Michigan among 10 college football teams entering upcoming season boasting most 2025 NFL Draft talent

The 2024 NFL Draft is in the books, and the football world has already moved on to the 2025 cycle. CBS Sports NFL Draft expert Ryan Wilson has already released his early 2025 Mock Draft, and his peers have participated in similar exercises as they start to build out their big board for next year.

Of course, that also sets the stage for the teams that NFL Draft experts will follow the most on Saturdays this fall. Championships in college football are not won or lost based on how many top NFL Draft picks you have on the roster, but assembling that kind of talent is a starting point for entry in the title contention discussion.

It should come as no surprise, then, that some of the teams we are highlighting below are ones likely to be competing for conference titles and spots in the expanded 12-team College Football Playoff bracket. That’s not the case for every team, but certainly for the ones that have the most players getting recognition as a top pick in next year’s NFL Draft.

Ohio State
Notable prospects: CB Denzel Burke, EDGE JT Tuimoloau, WR Emeka Egbuka, EDGE Jack Sawyer, RB Quinshon Judkins, DL Tyleik Williams, OL Donovan Jackson, RB TreVeyon Henderson

As we wrote in the NFL Draft Winners and Losers over the weekend, Ohio State had a 2024 NFL Draft that cut two ways. On one hand, four picks marked a drop-off in production after having at least six players drafted every year since 2016. The Buckeyes were nowhere close to their usual status as one of the most prolific draft pick producers, and you could consider that a rough year. But the other side of that is the handful of players who could have gone pro in 2024 but elected to come back to Columbus and lead what is going to be one of the most talent-heavy teams in the sport. If those players had gone pro, we would have seen Ohio State flirt with double-digit picks, but instead they’re going to be loaded up to make 2025 a banner year for Buckeyes in the draft.

Michigan
Notable prospects: CB Will Johnson, DL Mason Graham, TE Colston Loveland, DL Kenneth Grant, EDGE Derrick Moore, RB Donovan Edwards, DB Rod Moore

After leading all schools in picks this year, it looks like the Wolverines will again be sending key pieces from last season’s national championship run to the early rounds of the 2025 NFL Draft. Graham might have been the top defensive lineman taken if he was available in the 2024 Draft, and the combination of he and Grant is only going to continue to bring attention to their ability to excel at the next level. Unlike rival Ohio State, the recruiting profiles of this group isn’t necessarily at the top of the sport — though most were four-star prospects — but the player development in Ann Arbor has been able to close that gap so that the Wolverines are winning on the field and competing player-for-player in NFL Draft picks.

Georgia
Notable prospects: QB Carson Beck, DB Malaki Starks, EDGE Mykel Williams, OL Earnest Greene, LB Smael Mondon, DL Nazir Stackhouse, OL Tate Ratledge, WR Dom Lovett

I know this will come as a shock to see Georgia carrying a lot of NFL Draft picks on the roster, but we are once again looking at a Bulldogs team that could flirt with double-digit picks in 2025. And the balance of this group is great, with at least one notable NFL Draft prospect from every position group. Because of the way Kirby Smart recruits, there’s rarely an obvious weakness on a Georgia roster, but this kind of talent balance helps illuminate why experts seem fairly certain on the Bulldogs’ starting the season as the No. 1 team in the country in 2024. Beck, Starks and Williams could all be the first player taken at their position in the 2025 NFL Draft, and they’ll be joined by the annual collection of Georgia lineman and defenders who seem to get drafted every season.

Texas
Notable prospects: OL Kelvin Banks, QB Quinn Ewers, WR Isaiah Bond, EDGE Trey Moore, EDGE Alfred Collins, OL DJ Campbell

This is where we see Steve Sarkisian’s roster building pay off. Banks and Campbell were the highest-rated players in his 2022 recruiting class, and those efforts were part of a larger effort during his first years to establish a dominance along both lines of scrimmage. Bond and Moore, meanwhile, were picked up through the transfer portal to help address immediate needs. That blend of high school recruiting and player development with savvy portal additions is the recipe for success in the modern game, and Sark is doing it about as well as anyone in the country.

Texas A&M
Notable prospects: EDGE Nic Scourton, DL Shemar Turner, OL Reuben Fatheree, WR Noah Thomas, QB Conner Weigman

Mike Elko inherited a Texas A&M program that has been recruiting at a high level while falling short of expectations on the field, so it’s not as though talent is going to be an issue for the Aggies. The key here is that while they have seen some transfer portal exits for those blue-chip recruits since the coaching change from Jimbo Fisher, Elko and his staff have also reached into the portal to pick up NFL-caliber talent to restock the shelves. Scourton was one of the big wins in the portal, and pairing him with Turner is going to make Texas A&M’s defensive front a must-see for any NFL scout. Fatheree and Thomas are both physically gifted and have a chance to play their way up draft boards this fall, as does Weigman, who has flashed high-end talent but struggled to stay healthy.

LSU
Notable prospects: OL Will Campbell, LB Harold Perkins, OT Emery Jones, QB Garrett Nussmeier, WR Kyren Lacy

LSU could challenge Ohio State, Michigan and Georgia for their first-round pick count thanks in part to two elite tackles in Campbell and Jones, as well as one of the fastest football players (at any position) in the draft in Perkins. The conversation around Perkins has much more to do with how to best utilize his talent and tools. While he’s been moved around the defense throughout his career, any NFL team would love the problem of figuring out what to do with such a gifted player. And while Nussmeier might not win the Heisman Trophy, he could see a Jayden Daniels-like ascension on the draft boards once scouts finally see his arm talent in action against quality opponents this fall.

Colorado
Notable prospects: QB Shedeur Sanders, CB Travis Hunter, WR Jimmy Horn Jr.

Colorado could find itself standing alongside programs like Ohio State, Georgia and Michigan in having multiple first-round picks, but the Buffaloes don’t have quite the depth of future pros you’ll find at other schools on this list who project more in later rounds. Sanders is slotted as the No. 1 overall pick in Ryan Wilson’s 2025 Mock Draft, with Hunter falling right behind him at No. 2. Having difference-makers like that at the top of the roster gives Colorado a chance to win every Saturday, but there aren’t a lot of obvious Day 3 NFL Draft types. For balance, we’ve included one player who might fit that bill — Horn — as a wide receiver who could rise in the rankings with his play on the field this fall. Horn also is a special teams threat with legitimate track speed, and as the offense pivots with coaching staff changes, there could be a spot for him to emerge.

Penn State
Notable prospects: LB Abdul Carter, EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton, RB Nick Singleton, DB Kevin Winston, QB Drew Allar

The NFL Draft is another place where we are seeing the consistency of Penn State’s talent level pay off, with multiple early-round picks nearly every single season in recent years. Carter and Dennis-Sutton are projected to be next in that line, but what will be interesting to track is whether Allar will join the quarterbacks at the top of the draft class by the end of the season. Allar exited high school with a first-round NFL Draft projection and comparisons to Josh Allen thanks to his size (6-foot-5, 241 pounds) and tools. But Penn State’s passing attack hasn’t been nearly as lethal as what, for example, fellow 2025 NFL Draft class quarterback Quinn Ewers can do with the skill players at Texas. The 2024 season with a new offensive coordinator marks a big opportunity for Allar to return to deliver play that has evaluators sliding him back up into that first-round conversation.

Notre Dame
Notable prospects: CB Benjamin Morrison, DL Howard Cross, TE Mitchell Evans, QB Riley Leonard, DB Xavier Watts

Morrison and Watts have each appeared to be among the best at their position during the last two years, so the fact they are still in college football is great news for Notre Dame in 2024 and extremely disappointing for their opponents. They’re joined in this group by a surefire pick on the defensive line in Cross and an extremely intriguing quarterback in Leonard, who arrives from Duke through the transfer portal. Leonard is an extremely gifted athlete who has been a late bloomer as a football player, and while his stats rarely wow you, the playmaking ability is undeniable. If he can take steps forward in Notre Dame’s offense this year, he could be another player to see a late surge in the draft discussion.

Ole Miss
Notable prospects: EDGE Princely Umanmielen, DL Walter Nolen, QB Jaxson Dart, WR Tre Harris, WR Juice Wells

Lane Kiffin was one of the first to claim the title of the “Portal King,” and this group certainly highlights how Ole Miss has used the modern tools of roster building to load up with future NFL talent. All five of these players were portal additions at one point or another, with Umanmielen (Florida), Nolen (Texas A&M) and Wells (South Carolina) being the latest examples of Kiffin and his staff shopping opponents’ rosters to find their new starters. Umanmielen and Nolen seem certain to get early round consideration, while Dart and the wide receivers could be later-round selections, but this is a program that’s all-in on 2024 and will therefore be among the top producers in NFL Draft picks come 2025.

02 May

The best uncommitted transfer prospects still left in the portal as spring window closes

The spring transfer portal window closed Tuesday and won’t open again until the end of the 2024 regular season. Though the last two weeks haven’t produced the fireworks some expected, several notable names decided to test the water and search for new pastures.

A majority of those portal entrants moved quickly to find new homes. But there are still several good prospects on the market who have until the next recruiting dead period to take visits and talk with coaches.

According to 247Sports’ Transfer Rankings, 14 uncommitted players grade out as four stars. Transfers left on the market run the gamut from former blue-chip prospects who couldn’t quite find the field at their old school to veterans with proven production.

The list even includes some 2024 signees who never even got to take a snap at their initial school. Whatever the case may be, here are the top uncommitted transfers left on the board with the spring window officially closed to new entries.

Jason Zandamela, OL
Former school: USC

247Sports Ranking: 97

Zandamela wasn’t just the best player to enter during a relatively light spring window — he’s one of the top overall prospects, regardless of when they hopped into the portal. He is the top-ranked interior offensive lineman in 247Sports’ Transfer Rankings and lands at No. 7 overall nationally, just outside the five-star range. There’s plenty of reason for the hype. Zandamela was the top-ranked signee in USC’s 2024 recruiting class and the only top-50 player out of high school to sign with the Trojans during that cycle. He enrolled in January and went through spring practice at USC before entering the portal in April. All signs indicate that the Clearwater, Florida product wants to play closer to home, as he already has three 247Sports Crystal Ball predictions forecasting him to Florida.

Cormani McClain, CB
Former school: Colorado

247Sports Ranking: 94

McClain signed with Colorado in 2023 after a whirlwind recruitment that saw multiple schools emerge as potential favorites and a previous commitment to Miami fall by the wayside. His pledge to Colorado was quite the coup for first-year coach Deion Sanders, as McClain — the No. 1 cornerback and No. 14 overall prospect in his class — was the highest-ranked recruit to sign with the Buffaloes in 23 years. That hype didn’t materialize into opportunities early on in his first year. In September, Sanders publicly criticized McClain’s work ethic and “desire to play this game.” McClain eventually worked his way into Sanders’ good graces and ended up logging four stars as injuries started to pile up for Colorado, finishing the year with 13 tackles and two pass breakups.

Jacoby Mathews, S
Former school: Texas A&M

247Sports Ranking: 92

Mathews was one of 18 top-100 players to sign with Texas A&M in its historic 2022 class. He emerged as a starter in the final three games of his freshman year before locking down a more consistent spot in 2023 as a sophomore. Mathews started nine games in 2023 and finished the year with 42 total tackles, one interception and four pass breakups. Experienced safeties are hard to find, so Mathews likely has a decent list of suitors vying for his services.

Tyler Baron, EDGE
Former school: Louisville

247Sports Ranking: 92

Baron, who last took in-game snaps at Tennessee, initially committed to Ole Miss during the winter transfer window before finally enrolling at Louisville. After going through spring practice with the Cardinals, he was part of an exodus of one-time transfers who decided to leave Louisville in the spring window. The 6-foot-5 and 260-pound Baron had 10.5 tackles for loss and six sacks with the Vols in 2023 and is considered the top pass-rusher left on the market.

Derrick Harmon, DL
Former school: Michigan State

247Sports Ranking: 91

A member of the high school class of 2021, Harmon is one of the more veteran players left in the portal. He was a key member of Michigan State’s defensive line rotation over the past couple of years, tallying 68 total tackles and 3.5 sacks while plugging the middle for the Spartans. At 6-foot-5 and 320 pounds, Harmon is a space-eater who occupies gaps and makes it difficult for opposing teams to run up the middle.

Damonic Williams, DL
Former school: TCU

247Sports Ranking: 91

Arguably TCU’s top returning player, Williams’ departure was a tough pill for the Horned Frogs to swallow. The former three-star prospect and Torrance, California native was a 2022 247Sports True Freshman All-American. He started every game in TCU’s Cinderella run to the College Football Playoff National Championship, generating 24 tackles, 3.5 tackles for loss and 1.5 sacks. He saw his production increase across the board in 2023 and, importantly, became way more disruptive from the interior, logging three sacks and anchoring the Horned Frogs’ defensive front.

Terrance Brooks, CB
Former school: Texas

247Sports Ranking: 91

Brooks’ entry came as a great surprise. He was locked into one of Texas’ starting boundary corner spots after flourishing in the role and earning honorable mention All-Big 12 honors last season. The former blue-chip prospect had 30 tackles, six pass deflections and three interceptions while aiding the Longhorns in their journey to a Big 12 title and their first College Football Playoff appearance in program history. Now Texas, which has national championship hopes, has to replace both of its starting cornerbacks from last year’s squad.

Jayden Wayne, EDGE
Former school: Miami

247Sports Ranking: 91

Wayne signed with Miami in 2023 out of Bradenton, Florida-based powerhouse IMG Academy. The No. 104 prospect nationally and No. 14 edge rusher in his class initially chose the Hurricanes over interest from other blueblood programs like Georgia and Alabama. He had a quiet freshman season, starting one game and spending most of the season as a reserve. Still, Wayne’s pedigree and his 6-foot-6 frame make him an attractive take out of the portal based on upside alone.

Dermaricus Davis, QB
Former school: Washington

247Sports Ranking: 90

Davis never even got to suit up with the Huskies. A late riser in the class of 2024 that climbed all the way to four-star status after a strong senior season at Rancho Cucamonga, California’s Etiwanda High School, he signed with Washington over offers from Arizona and Oregon State, among others. He initially stuck around when former Washington coach Kalen DeBoer left for Alabama and Fisch was hired as his successor. The 6-foot-5 signal caller went through most of UW’s spring practice slate before entering the portal in late April. He’s essentially a four-star high school prospect again, with all four years of eligibility remaining and slight collegiate (practice) experience under his belt.

Peny Boone, RB
Former school: Louisville

247Sports Ranking: 90

Like Baron, Boone committed to Louisville during the winter transfer window and re-entered the portal after spring practice. The 6-foot-1 and 242-pound bowling ball will be a valuable asset for whatever team picks him up over the next couple of months. He was crowned the 2023 MAC Offensive Player of the Year after rushing for 1,400 yards and 15 touchdowns at Toledo.

Elijhah Badger, WR
Former school: Arizona State

247Sports Ranking: 90

It’s been a relatively rough spring for Arizona State, but few departures have hit as hard as Badger’s. One of the Pac-12’s most consistent playmakers in recent years, he led the Sun Devils in receiving in each of the last two seasons and departs Tempe with 142 career receptions for 1,640 yards and 10 touchdowns. He did all this despite undergoing a coaching transition and a revolving door at quarterback.

25 Mar

Surprising bracket upset picks, games, best advice, strategy, predictions

The NCAA Basketball Tournament 2024 already has four teams that have advanced as Colorado, Colorado State, Howard, Wagner and Grambling earned trips to the first round by winning in Dayton. Three 2024 First Four teams have gone to at least the Sweet 16 in the past decade, so those teams should all be in consideration for your 2024 NCAA bracket upset picks. 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket locks at 12:15 p.m. ET on Thursday, so time is running out to make your 2024 March Madness predictions for all the games.

What strategy should you use to differentiate your 2024 March Madness bracket picks? Only three seeds lower than No. 4 have ever won it all, but with parity increasing recently in the NCAA Tournament, perhaps this is a year to take a swing on a huge Cinderella. Before making any predictions for games in the 2024 NCAA Tournament, see the March Madness bracket picks from the proven computer model at SportsLine.

SportsLine’s projection model has simulated every game in the tournament 10,000 times. It has absolutely crushed its March Madness picks recently, beating over 92% of all CBS Sports brackets in three of the past five tournaments. In an upset-laden 2023 NCAA Tournament, the model was all over UConn’s shocking Final Four run as a 4-seed. It went an amazing 23-9 in the first round, including an astounding 12-4 in the Midwest and West regions.

It knows how to spot an upset as well. The same model has produced brackets that have nailed 20 first-round upsets by double-digit seeds since its inception in 2016.

Now, SportsLine’s advanced computer model has simulated the entire 2024 NCAA Tournament 10,000 times to come up with the perfect 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket and find out which teams will pull off the biggest upsets. You shouldn’t even think about making a pick without seeing what their model has to say.

Top 2024 NCAA Basketball Tournament bracket upset picks
One Midwest Region surprise the model has identified: No. 5 Gonzaga advances to the Sweet 16, getting past a dangerous underdog in McNeese in the first round and then knocking off No. 4 Kansas in the second round. The latest 2024 NCAA Tournament odds imply that Gonzaga has a less than 50% chance of advancing this far. SportsLine’s model, however, has the Bulldogs rolling by 16 points in the first round. They are then the projected model favorites against a banged-up Kansas team in the second round.

Mark Few’s team wasn’t as dominant this regular season, failing to win at least one of the WCC regular season or tournament championships for the first time since 2011-12. That has made some bracket players fade the Bulldogs, but the model sees them as a value pick that can give you an edge in 2024 March Madness bracket.

Another surprise from the Midwest Region: No. 3 Creighton runs the table in the region, getting past No. 2 Tennessee and No. 1 Purdue as the Bluejays punch their ticket to the Final Four in Phoenix. The Bluejays are playing in a region that features elite teams who lack recent NCAA Tournament success, as Purdue has not made the Final Four since 1980 and Tennessee has never made it.

Meanwhile, Creighton has won a game in the past three tournaments, including a Sweet 16 trip in 2021 and an Elite Eight run last year. The Bluejays have four seniors, one junior and one sophomore in their key six-man rotation, and all of them have prior tournament experience. KenPom ranks them as the eighth-most experienced lineup in college basketball, which is one reason why they can get past the Boilermakers and Vols in the Midwest Region. See which other 2024 March Madness upsets to target here.

How to make 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket predictions
SportsLine’s model is also predicting a stunning 4-seed that will reach the Final Four and has one region where the 1- and 3-seeds go down hard before the Elite Eight. With the model’s track record of calling bracket-busting upsets, you’ll want to see which stunners it’s calling this year before locking in any 2024 NCAA bracket picks.

25 Mar

Top bracket busters, March Madness Cinderella picks by proven college basketball model

Will No. 12 McNeese be the March Madness Cinderella story coming out of the 2024 NCAA Tournament? The Cowboys topped the Southland Conference thanks to an 11-game winning streak and enter March Madness 2024 following a 30-3 season and conference tournament victory. McNeese got those wins by outscoring its opponents, averaging 80.5 points per game. They are still the underdogs against No. 8 Gonzaga in the Round of 64 in the 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket, but their recent form sets McNeese up to be one of the potential 2024 March Madness bracket busters.

There are several exciting underdogs to consider when putting together your 2024 March Madness bracket strategy, including No. 16 Stetson against reigning tournament champion No. 1 UConn in the East Region. Before making any 2024 NCAA Tournament predictions, see the March Madness bracket picks from the proven computer model at SportsLine.

This model, which simulates every game 10,000 times, has nailed 20 first-round upsets by double-digit seeds since its inception in 2016 and nailed UConn’s dramatic Final Four run as a 4-seed last year. It went an amazing 22-10 in the first round, including an astounding 12-4 in the Midwest and West regions.

Last year, SportsLine’s computer simulation nailed massive upsets, including huge wins by No. 13 Furman over No. 4 Virginia and No. 10 Penn State over No. 7 Texas A&M. The model has beaten over 92% of all CBS Sports bracket players in three of the past five tournaments.

Now, SportsLine’s advanced computer model has simulated the entire 2024 NCAA Tournament 10,000 times to come up with the perfect 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket and find out which teams will pull off the biggest upsets. You shouldn’t even think about making a pick without seeing what their model has to say.

Top 2024 March Madness bracket upset picks
One Midwest Region surprise the model has identified: No. 11 Oregon knocks off No. 6 South Carolina. You can throw the season statistics out of the window for Oregon since it played almost half of the year without its best player, N’Faly Dante. The Ducks are a different squad with him anchoring both ends of the court, as he leads the team in points (16.2), rebounds (8.8), steals (1.7) and blocks (1.9). He led Oregon to the Pac-12 tournament championship, while South Carolina is coming off a 31-point drubbing at the hands of Auburn in the SEC Tournament.

That was the latest example of South Carolina simply not showing up, and that’s happened far too often for Lamont Paris’ liking. South Carolina has losses of 27 points, 31 points and 40 points since the start of the new year. That’s a poor omen against an improved Oregon defense that has kept four straight opponents under 69 points, each failing to shoot 45% from the field.

Another surprise from the Midwest Region: No. 3 Creighton advances all the way to the Final Four, surpassing No. 2 seed Tennessee and top-seeded Purdue. A No. 3 seed hasn’t made it to the Final Four since Texas Tech in 2019, but Greg McDermott’s Bluejays are entering the NCAA Tournament 2024 strong. They ended the regular season 23-9 and notched key wins along the way, including a 89-75 victory against Marquette and a 85-66 rout against reigning March Madness champion UConn.

The last time the Vols made it to the Elite Eight was 2010, and they haven’t made it out of the first round in two of their last seven trips to The Big Dance. Meanwhile, the Boilermakers have been booted in the first round twice in recent history, including in 2023 when they were a No. 1 seed. See which other 2024 March Madness upsets to target here.

How to make 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket predictions
SportsLine’s model is also predicting a stunning No. 12 seed that will reach the Sweet Sixteen and has one region where three double-digit underdogs pull off first-round shockers, busting brackets everywhere. With the model’s track record of calling bracket-busting upsets, you’ll want to see which stunners it’s calling this year before locking in any 2024 NCAA bracket picks.

25 Mar

NCAA Tournament picks, optimal predictions from top-rated college basketball model

The 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket has officially arrived and the madness already began during the First Four. There’s already been an overtime game, resulting in Grambling advancing to face No. 1 Purdue on Friday. In addition, Virginia’s offense went scoreless over the final 9:30 of the first half in a 67-42 victory for Colorado State. Since the introduction of the First Four round in 2011, every NCAA Tournament outside of 2019 had at least one First Four team win a game in the Round of 64. How should that affect how you build your 2024 March Madness bracket?

Purdue is hoping history doesn’t repeat itself when the Boilermakers lost to Fairleigh Dickinson after the Knights won their 1 vs. 16 game last season. Purdue finds itself in a similar situation, but only two No. 1 seeds have lost to a No. 16 seed in NCAA Tournament history, so you could feel confident that Purdue won’t fall victim to another opening loss. Purdue is now a No. 4 seed or better for the seventh straight season, but has only made it past the Sweet 16 once. Should you have Purdue in the Final Four of your 2024 NCAA bracket? Before filling out your NCAA Tournament bracket 2024, be sure to see the 2024 March Madness bracket picks from the proven computer model at SportsLine.

SportsLine’s projection model has simulated every game in the tournament 10,000 times. It has absolutely crushed its March Madness picks recently, beating over 92% of all CBS Sports brackets in three of the past five tournaments. In an upset-laden 2023 NCAA Tournament, the model was all over UConn’s shocking Final Four run as a 4-seed. It went an amazing 23-9 in the first round, including an astounding 12-4 in the Midwest and West regions.

It knows how to spot an upset as well. The same model has produced brackets that have nailed 20 first-round upsets by double-digit seeds since its inception in 2016.

There’s no reason to rely on luck when there’s proven technology to help you dominate your 2024 March Madness picks. Now, with the 2024 NCAA bracket revealed, the model is simulating the matchups and its results are in. You can only see it over at SportsLine.

Top 2024 March Madness bracket picks
One of the Midwest Region picks from the model: No. 3 seed Creighton goes on a surprise run to the Final Four. Creighton has proven capable of knocking off any team in the country, as displayed with a 19-point victory over UConn, the overall No. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Creighton has three players averaging more than 17 points per game, giving the Bluejays the offensive versatility that if one player has an off-scoring night, it doesn’t immediately signal the end of their run. Baylor Scheierman, a 6-foot-7 guard, leads the team in scoring (18.4 ppg), rebounds (9.0), and blocks (3.0) while shooting 37.2% on 3-pointers while making 99 triples. He’s tied for the 23rd-most made 3-pointers in college basketball, doing so against some of the top competition in the country.

Creighton is third in the country in effective field goal percentage (57.5%) and fourth in shooting efficiency. The Bluejays average 80.5 points per game, the 23rd-most in the nation, with the 17th-best average scoring margin in college basketball. Creighton is one of the few teams in the country to match an efficient offense with an efficient defense, pairing the fourth-best opponent shooting efficiency with the 13th-best opponent effective field goal percentage in the nation. The Bluejays have all you’d want in a Final Four team for your 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket.

Another surprise: No. 5 Gonzaga gets past No. 4 Kansas in the second round of the Midwest. Kansas is the only school with two Wooden Award finalists, but one of those, Kevin McCullar Jr., has been ruled out for the entire 2024 NCAA Tournament due to a knee injury. Kansas played six games without McCullar this season and averaged 10 fewer points than the 26 games they played with him.

Gonzaga has few questions offensively. The Zags have the 17th-lowest turnover rate in the nation, and those extra possessions on offense allow Graham Ike to dominate in the paint. The Wyoming transfer has effectively replaced Drew Timme and is scoring 16.5 points per game on over 60% shooting. Meanwhile, Creighton transfer Ryan Nembhard had a 30-point game in last year’s tournament and enters this year’s with three straight double-digit assist games. You can see the model’s 2024 NCAA bracket picks here.

How to make 2024 NCAA bracket predictions
Who wins every tournament-defining matchup, and which teams will make surprising runs through the 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket? With the model’s track record of calling bracket-busting upsets, you’ll want to see which stunners it’s calling this year before locking in any 2024 NCAA bracket picks.

25 Mar

2024 NCAA Tournament picks by proven model

A first-round matchup in the 2024 NCAA Tournament has the No. 9 seed Michigan State Spartans and the No. 8 seed Mississippi State Bulldogs squaring off on Thursday. The Bulldogs have made the tournament 12 times in school history. On the other side, Michigan State has made the tournament 26 years in a row.

Tipoff from the Spectrum Center in Charlotte is set for 12:15 p.m. ET. The Spartans are 1-point favorites in the latest Michigan State vs. Mississippi State odds via SportsLine consensus, while the over/under for total points scored is 130.5. Before making any Mississippi State vs. Michigan State picks, be sure to see the college basketball predictions and betting advice from SportsLine’s proven model.

The model simulates every Division I college basketball game 10,000 times. It enters the 2024 NCAA tournament on a 148-106 roll on all top-rated college basketball picks dating back to last season, returning more than $1,700 for $100 players. It also has a strong 29-19 (+810) record on top-rated spread picks this season. Anyone following has seen huge returns.

Now, the model has set its sights on Michigan State vs. Mississippi State. You can head to SportsLine to see its picks. Here are several college basketball odds and trends for Mississippi State vs. Michigan State:

Michigan State vs. Mississippi State spread: Spartans -1
Michigan State vs. Mississippi State over/under: 130.5 points
Michigan State vs. Mississippi State money line: Spartans -121, Bulldogs +100
MSU: Michigan State has hit the team total Under in 21 of their last 35 games
MSST: Mississippi State has hit the 1H game total Under in 18 of their last 30 games
Michigan State vs. Mississippi State picks: See picks at SportsLine
Why Michigan State can cover
Senior forward Malik Hall is an all-around player for the Spartans. Hall scores by attacking the basket while putting a lot of energy into defense and rebounding. The Illinois native averages 12.6 points and 5.6 rebounds per game. In his last matchup, Hall racked up 12 points, seven rebounds, and two steals.

Senior A.J. Hoggard is an aggressive and energetic guard in the backcourt. Hoggard excels at driving to the basket and plays feisty defense. The Pennsylvania native averages 11 points, three rebounds, and 5.2 assists per game. On Mar. 14 against Minnesota, Hoggard finished with 17 points and six assists. See which team to pick at SportsLine.

Why Mississippi State can cover
Freshman guard Josh Hubbard is a creative shot creator with a nice shooting touch on multiple spots on the court. The Mississippi native is putting up a team-best 17.1 points, 2.1 rebounds and 1.7 assists per game. He’s scored 20-plus points in seven of his last eight games. In the second round of the SEC Tournament, Hubbard totaled 24 points and two assists.

Senior forward Tolu Smith provides the Bulldogs with a force in the frontcourt. Smith scores from the low post with ease and uses his size to create space for rebounds. The Mississippi native logs 15.2 points, 8.4 rebounds and shoots 56% from the field. In his last outing, Smith had 10 points and 10 rebounds. See which team to pick at SportsLine.

How to make Mississippi State vs. Michigan State picks
The model is leaning Over on the total, projecting the teams to combine for 138 points. It also says one side of the spread nearly 60% of the time. You can only see the pick at SportsLine.

25 Mar

2024 NCAA Tournament picks, best bets by proven model

The sixth-seeded BYU Cougars will look to reach the second round for the first time in 10 years when they battle the 11th-seeded Duquesne Dukes in the first round of the 2024 NCAA Tournament on Thursday. The Cougars (23-10), who have won four of their past six games, are making their 31st NCAA Tournament appearance and first since 2021. The Dukes (24-11), who have won eight consecutive games, last played in the NCAA Tournament in 1977. Duquesne holds a 2-0 all-time series lead, but the teams last met in 1953.

Tipoff from the CHI Health Center in Omaha, Neb., is set for 12:40 p.m. ET. The Cougars are 9.5-point favorites in the latest Duquesne vs. BYU odds from SportsLine consensus, while the over/under for total points scored is 141.5. Before making any BYU vs. Duquesne picks, be sure to see the college basketball predictions and betting advice from SportsLine’s proven model.

The model simulates every Division I college basketball game 10,000 times. It enters the 2024 NCAA tournament on a 148-106 roll on all top-rated college basketball picks dating back to last season, returning more than $1,700 for $100 players. It also has a strong 29-19 (+810) record on top-rated spread picks this season. Anyone following has seen huge returns.

Now, the model has set its sights on Duquesne vs. BYU. You can head to SportsLine to see its picks. Here are several college basketball odds and trends for BYU vs. Duquesne:

Duquesne vs. BYU spread: BYU -9.5
Duquesne vs. BYU over/under: 141.5 points
Duquesne vs. BYU money line: Duquesne +353, BYU -460
DUQ: The Dukes are 18-16 against the spread this season
BYU: The Cougars are 6-4 ATS over the past 10 games
Duquesne vs. BYU picks: See picks at SportsLine
Why BYU can cover
Four players average double-digit scoring, including junior guard Trevin Knell. In 32 games, including 27 starts, he is averaging 10.9 points, 3.4 rebounds and 1.3 assists in 24.5 minutes. He has reached double-figure scoring 18 times, including a season-high 27 points in a 71-60 loss to Cincinnati on Jan. 6. He scored 20 points in an 87-75 win over TCU on March 2.

Also providing offense for BYU is senior guard Spencer Johnson. He has started all 33 games for the Cougars and is averaging 10.3 points, six rebounds, 3.3 assists and one steal. He has scored 10 or more points in 18 games, including three double-doubles. He scored a season-high 28 points, while adding nine rebounds and five assists in an 87-72 win over Iowa State on Jan. 16. See which team to pick at SportsLine.

Why Duquesne can cover
The Dukes have been led by senior guard Dae Dae Grant. The fifth-year player in his second season at Duquesne, has played in 32 games, including 30 starts, and is averaging 16.7 points, 3.4 rebounds, 2.5 assists and one steal in 32.8 minutes. He has reached double-digit scoring in each of the last four games, including a 27-point performance in a 70-60 win over St. Bonaventure in the Atlantic 10 semifinals. In the league’s title game, he scored 10 points and added four steals and two assists. He is connecting on 93.9% of his free throws.

Senior guard Jimmy Clark also provides some scoring punch for Duquesne. He has scored in double figures in four of the past five games, including 20 or more in two of those. In a 67-65 win over George Washington on March 9, he scored 22 points, while adding three assists and two rebounds. He had 20 points, four assists and four rebounds in an 83-73 win over Saint Louis on March 13 in the second round of the A-10 Tournament. In 35 games, all starts, he is averaging 15.1 points, 3.8 assists, 3.4 rebounds and 2.4 steals in 31.1 minutes. See which team to pick at SportsLine.

How to make Duquesne vs. BYU picks
The model is leaning Over on the total, projecting the teams to combine for 147 points. It also says one side of the spread hits well over 50% of the time. You can only see the pick at SportsLine.

25 Mar

Surprising bracket upset picks, games, best advice, strategy, predictions

The NCAA Basketball Tournament 2024 already has four teams that have advanced as Colorado, Colorado State, Howard, Wagner and Grambling earned trips to the first round by winning in Dayton. Three 2024 First Four teams have gone to at least the Sweet 16 in the past decade, so those teams should all be in consideration for your 2024 NCAA bracket upset picks. 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket locks at 12:15 p.m. ET on Thursday, so time is running out to make your 2024 March Madness predictions for all the games.

What strategy should you use to differentiate your 2024 March Madness bracket picks? Only three seeds lower than No. 4 have ever won it all, but with parity increasing recently in the NCAA Tournament, perhaps this is a year to take a swing on a huge Cinderella. Before making any predictions for games in the 2024 NCAA Tournament, see the March Madness bracket picks from the proven computer model at SportsLine.

SportsLine’s projection model has simulated every game in the tournament 10,000 times. It has absolutely crushed its March Madness picks recently, beating over 92% of all CBS Sports brackets in three of the past five tournaments. In an upset-laden 2023 NCAA Tournament, the model was all over UConn’s shocking Final Four run as a 4-seed. It went an amazing 23-9 in the first round, including an astounding 12-4 in the Midwest and West regions.

It knows how to spot an upset as well. The same model has produced brackets that have nailed 20 first-round upsets by double-digit seeds since its inception in 2016.

Now, SportsLine’s advanced computer model has simulated the entire 2024 NCAA Tournament 10,000 times to come up with the perfect 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket and find out which teams will pull off the biggest upsets. You shouldn’t even think about making a pick without seeing what their model has to say.

Top 2024 NCAA Basketball Tournament bracket upset picks
One Midwest Region surprise the model has identified: No. 5 Gonzaga advances to the Sweet 16, getting past a dangerous underdog in McNeese in the first round and then knocking off No. 4 Kansas in the second round. The latest 2024 NCAA Tournament odds imply that Gonzaga has a less than 50% chance of advancing this far. SportsLine’s model, however, has the Bulldogs rolling by 16 points in the first round. They are then the projected model favorites against a banged-up Kansas team in the second round.

Mark Few’s team wasn’t as dominant this regular season, failing to win at least one of the WCC regular season or tournament championships for the first time since 2011-12. That has made some bracket players fade the Bulldogs, but the model sees them as a value pick that can give you an edge in 2024 March Madness bracket.

Another surprise from the Midwest Region: No. 3 Creighton runs the table in the region, getting past No. 2 Tennessee and No. 1 Purdue as the Bluejays punch their ticket to the Final Four in Phoenix. The Bluejays are playing in a region that features elite teams who lack recent NCAA Tournament success, as Purdue has not made the Final Four since 1980 and Tennessee has never made it.

Meanwhile, Creighton has won a game in the past three tournaments, including a Sweet 16 trip in 2021 and an Elite Eight run last year. The Bluejays have four seniors, one junior and one sophomore in their key six-man rotation, and all of them have prior tournament experience. KenPom ranks them as the eighth-most experienced lineup in college basketball, which is one reason why they can get past the Boilermakers and Vols in the Midwest Region. See which other 2024 March Madness upsets to target here.

How to make 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket predictions
SportsLine’s model is also predicting a stunning 4-seed that will reach the Final Four and has one region where the 1- and 3-seeds go down hard before the Elite Eight. With the model’s track record of calling bracket-busting upsets, you’ll want to see which stunners it’s calling this year before locking in any 2024 NCAA bracket picks.